Sunday, July 2, 2023

A Fair and Fine Policy?

 

-          Reflections over Canada’s China Policy

 

(Chinese President Xi Jinping shakes hands with Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau during the 2016 Group of 20 Summit in China, with the picture taken by DAMIR SagoljREUTERS)

Abstract: Canada’s relationship with China is long-standing and dates from well before the establishment of diplomatic relations in 1970. Over 1.8 million Canadian residents are of Chinese origin, and Chinese is Canada’s third most spoken language after English and French. China is now Canada’s second largest trading partner. However, the Sino-Canada relationship is at a record low level due to multiple incidents including the mutual diplomat expelling, the sanction against AIIB and the proposed foreign interference act. Chinese interference fears have gripped Ottawa. In late February this year, some Canadian politicians and media successively hyped up the so-called "interference" of the Chinese consular agency in Canada in the election and internal affairs of Canada. The employee’s resignation from AIIB is weird and too much of a rush, making us wonder if foreign policy should be changed based on certain individual incidents. The proposed foreign interference act is targeted at Russia, China, Iran and North Korea, making us wonder why other countries are not mentioned. Though mutual trade continues to grow, it is worth noting that Q4 2022 saw a meaningful decline in imports from China to Canada. Broad relations between China and Canada chilled throughout 2022. In spite of the declining trend on the Canadian side, there are signs of increasing trade with China from the US and European side. the total trade in goods between China and the US in 2022 increased by about 5% over the previous year, reaching about 690 billion US dollars, more than 7 times the size between Canada and China. In 2022, Canada-China bilateral FDI dropped to its lowest since 2003; investment from China accounted for only 1% of total Asia-to-Canada FDI, and Canadian investment in China made up only 0.4% of Canadian outbound FDI in the region, well below the annual average of C$13B between 2003 and 2021. As for immigrants, in 2022 there was a sharp increase of immigrants from Afghanistan and Nigeria, whose people may surpass those from China and India in the future. While Canada is denouncing China and reducing its expatriates, the US is increasing its contact with Beijing and signing many record-breaking contracts. According to President Biden, the United States does not seek a new Cold War, it does not seek to change China’s system, its alliances are not directed at China, and it does not seek conflicts with China. In recent years, with the rise of China and the relative stagnation of Canada, China-Canada relations have faced a number of challenges and opportunities. Canada needs to strengthen cooperation with China in the economic and trade field for the mutual economic benefits of Canada and China as well as for maintaining a new international order. At the same time, China has made significant progress in scientific and technological innovations, artificial intelligence, 5G and other fields, and Canada needs to strengthen cooperation with China in these fields to enhance its competitiveness and economy of scale. Canada also needs to adopt a more positive attitude and take measures to strengthen its own development and reform. In short, China-Canada relations are so complex and important that joint efforts and cooperation from both sides are required. The present policy is not wise, fair, practicable nor sustainable. Containing or no contact is either stupid or vicious.

 

Key Words: China; threats; fairness; practicability; trade and investment

 

I. Situation

The present Sino-Canada relationship is at a record low level, possibly similar to the one when Meng of Huawei was arrested in Vancouver.

 

After being pressed by the Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, Foreign Affairs Minister Mélanie Joly cited China's "interference in our internal affairs" in declaring Chinese diplomat Zhao Wei persona non grata. As expected, in reply China expelled a Canadian diplomat, Jennifer Lynn Lalonde. The latest Canada-China spat is only one sign of hostility between the world's free-market democracies and what appears to be an emerging alternative bloc[i]. This was aggravated by the foreign police station assertion, the AIIB employee quitting incident and the foreign interference act proposal.

 

II. Problems

1. Trade

Exports to China expanded dramatically in the last few months of 2022. While total exports only grew 2% between 2021 and 2022, for most of 2022, exports were expected to shrink. In line with past trends, imports from China in 2022 grew once again, at a rate of 16.36% compared to 2021. It is worth noting that Q4 2022 saw a meaningful decline in imports from China to Canada. The rate of growth in trade with China is relatively 12.02% and 12.83% for the year 2021 and for the year 2022.

 

While November was a standout, broad relations between China and Canada chilled throughout 2022. This will unquestionably have some impact on the complexity of future trading and investment relations[ii].

 

In spite of the declining trend on the Canadian side, there are signs of increasing trade with China from the US and European side. Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates had a discussion with President Xi Jinping of China on June 16, 2023. He revealed on his blog that this is his first visit to China in four years. Let's look at Tesla, the U.S. pure electric vehicle (EV) manufacturer, whose Shanghai plant accounts for 40 percent of its production capacity (750,000 units). At the end of May, CEO Elon Musk visited China for the first time in three years. Jamie Dimon, CEO of JP Morgan Chase, the largest U.S. bank, visited Shanghai in late May and said he would not stop investing in the Chinese market. Apple CEO Tim Cook, Qualcomm CEO Cristiano Amon, Intel CEO Pat Kissinger and others have also visited China. According to the US Department of Commerce, the total trade in goods between China and the US in 2022 increased by about 5% over the previous year, reaching about 690 billion US dollars. In April, French President Emmanuel Macron led the head of Airbus and other business leaders to visit China and received a grand reception from the Chinese side. In addition, German Chancellor Scholz also led a business delegation to China last autumn. On June 20, a delegation led by Chinese Premier Li Qiang visited Germany to discuss economic cooperation[iii].

 

2. Investment

Since 2019, China has gradually lost its record-breaking inflation rates and forecasts of an impending recession likely contributed to the decline in two-way investment. Yet, they were not the only factors contributing to the decline in FDI flows. Other factors, such as the perception of regulatory uncertainty in Canada’s mining sector and a bleak global economic outlook – in the face of the war in Ukraine and weakened supply chains - have led to a slowdown in FDI flows as firms increasingly adopted a wait-and-see approach to investment.

 

In 2022, Canada-China bilateral FDI dropped to its lowest since 2003; investment from China accounted for only 1% of total Asia-to-Canada FDI, and Canadian investment in China made up only 0.4% of Canadian outbound FDI in the region, well below the annual average of C$13B between 2003 and 2021[iv].

 

This is in sharp contrast to the investment performance during the governance of Stephen Harper.

 

3. Immigrants

There was a 177 per cent spike in new permanent residents to Canada from Afghanistan in 2022. Last year, Canada welcomed 23,735 Afghanis as immigrants, up 15,165 people from the 8,570 in 2021. The meteoric rise in immigration from Afghanistan is all the more startling when last year’s performance is compared to the immigration level prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, in 2019. In those three years, immigration from Afghanistan to Canada has soared by 508.6 per cent.

 

Also showing a large percentage growth in immigration to Canada is Nigeria. Last year, that country was the fourth most important source of new permanent residents to Canada with 22,085 Nigerians making the move. That was up 41.6 per cent over the 15,595 Nigerians who became new permanent residents of Canada in 2021.

 

An old speech by UAE foreign minister Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed is going viral. In the clip, Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed is speaking against the blind influx of large-scale refugees into European nations and many netizens have essentially blamed them, mostly Muslims, for the violence in France. Those interested can take the time to watch what the UAE minister had said in 2017[v].

 

However, the rates of increase from India and from China are respectively 7.7% and 2.6% though they were the top two in the numbers[vi].

 

III. Discussion

1. Whether It Is Based on Facts

1) Chinese Overseas Police Stations

Safeguard Defenders, a Spanish human rights group, says China has dozens of police stations around the world, including in Britain and the United States. In a report last September, the group said the sites were being used to "harass, threaten, intimidate and coerce targets to return to China for persecution." "We have known for many months that Chinese police have been present all over Canada and we are making sure that the RCMP are following up and that our intelligence services are taking it seriously," Trudeau told reporters in Ottawa.

 

China's foreign ministry has lashed out at Canada over allegations that it secretly operates two overseas police stations in the province of Quebec. China's foreign Ministry has previously described these foreign police stations as service stations that provide official services to Chinese people abroad who need help, such as renewing their Chinese driving licenses. Such citizen services are usually performed by embassies or consulates and it is alleged that the actions of their overseas agents are in accordance with international law[vii].

 

After some investigations, the author has found out that some organizations have assisted certain Chinese regional police stations (like the Fuzhou Police Station) in the so called “Overseas 110 Operation” (note that “110” is similar to “911” in North America). First, such actions are legitimate to fight against financial or telecommunications fraud either at home or abroad. Secondly, those non-profit organizations are not police stations even though they may have helped certain Chinese regional police stations. Therefore, it is not wise to quickly accuse the Chinese side of such serious crimes. However, the Chinese side needs to notify the reciprocal party in Canada so that they can understand and cooperate in this respect, while the Canadian side needs to get to know and understand more before accusing the Chinese side of any wrongdoing.

 

2) China’s Interference in Canadian Politics

Chinese interference fears have gripped Ottawa. But appearing before House committees recently, Andrew Mitrovica realised that Canada should be scared most of its own MPs. The scheme is dangerous and corrosive. Livelihoods and reputations are being damaged by inept intelligence officials and their grateful conduits in the media and on Parliament Hill. In an interim report, Johnston found that China’s influence campaigns had no impact on those elections that media reports surrounding the scope and nature of that interference were overblown or “false,” and that, as a sinister by-product, loyal Canadians were being tarred as disloyal. It appears, according to Mitrovica, that a succession of federal court judges has, in the recent past, slammed the involved intelligence officials for withholding information from the court, lying and routinely breaking the law.

 

When questioned by the CTV journalist Joyce Napier about threats to his Hong Kong family regarding what kind of threat and who threatened, the Conservative MP Michael Chong could not specify what actual threat he got while he emphasized suppression of the Uyghur people in Xinjiang in the PRC. He also mentioned that he had not had any contact with his family for the last several years[viii]. In another occasion, Michael Chong said he was "deeply disappointed" that Canadian intelligence agencies did not alert him to a possible Chinese threat to his family in Hong Kong after learning of it in newspapers. While CSIS had briefed him on foreign threat operations, "those briefings did not mention specific threats to me or my family from those operations." In late February this year, some Canadian politicians and media successively hyped up the so-called "interference" of the Chinese consular agency in Canada in the election and internal affairs of Canada. The spokesperson of the Chinese Consulate General in Toronto pointed out that some Canadian media and politicians spread false information, deliberately damaging the reputation and image of the Consulate General and maliciously interfering with normal exchanges and cooperation between the two sides. The Consulate General urges relevant media and politicians to respect the facts and immediately stop spreading rumors and smearing people[ix].

 

Actually, McNamara formerly of Vancouver Police Service and Merrifield of RMCP – in addition to several Canadian politicians of Chinese descent – have had their allegiance to the maple leaf sullied by people of an intelligence agency who enjoy the comfort of anonymity. Those two are victims of a dangerous hysteria gripping Canada over the scope and nature of Chinese interference in Canadian elections and society, ginned up by scoop-thirsty reporters and timorous intelligence folks who do not give a single thought about the human costs of their sinister handiwork[x].

 

3) AIIB Employee Assertion

A senior employee of the Beijing-based Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) said on 15 June 2023 that he was advised to flee the country after resigning from the bank in protest over what he alleged was Chinese Communist Party influence[xi]. Bob Pickard, a Canadian national and former global communications chief for the AIIB, announced his resignation in a scathing social media post on 14 June 2023. He did not elaborate on who advised him to flee. Hours later Ottawa said it was freezing ties with the bank while it probed the allegations. China’s embassy in Canada said on 14 June 2023 that Pickard’s statements were “lies”. China’s foreign ministry on 15 June 2023 said the AIIB adhered to “principles of openness, meritocracy and transparency” when recruiting and managing staff. The AIIB said a day earlier it had accepted Pickard’s resignation and called his comments “baseless and disappointing.”

 

A public relations veteran, Pickard joined the AIIB in March 2022, according to his LinkedIn profile. Earlier this year, AIIB’s president said the bank would not get dragged into political disputes. AIIB later declared that it would cooperate with the Canadian side in its investigations.

 

AIIB was promoted by the Chinese government. However, it is a relevantly independent organization. With his rich experiences in public relations, the author thinks Pickard’s resignation is rather weird. From the fact that an individual resignation could trigger a bilateral dispute, the author would not recommend a quick conclusion, let alone that Pickard has been working as Director General of Communications at the bank. As a matter of fact, he had posted a year ago on LinkedIn, it “feels awesome to be back in Asia to start my new job as the comms chief at the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank”, and he washoping to be at my post in the bank's Beijing headquarters from May 10th onward”[xii].

 

2. Whether It Is Fair

The Minister of Public Safety, the Honourable Marco Mendicino, announced in March 2023 the launch of consultations to guide the creation of a Foreign Influence Transparency Registry in Canada, to ensure transparency and accountability from people who advocate on behalf of a foreign government and ensure communities who are often targeted by attempts at foreign interference are protected[xiii]. The national security adviser Jody Thomas says "a number of state actors and non-state proxies" are conducting foreign interference in Canada, and at a conference last week she listed three countries that Ottawa has frequently cited: China, Russia and Iran[xiv].

According to the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security, the state-sponsored cyber programs of China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea continue to pose the greatest strategic threats to Canada[xv].

 

In response to the“Foreign Influence Transparency Registry”, the organization Your View Matters highlighted several of the issues: a) the problems with the proposed registry such as the marginalization of immigrant communities; b) the validity of already-existing laws that can touch on foreign influence, and; c) the need to hold all governments with potential foreign influence operations in Canada to account, rather than a select few governments (like Russia, China, Iran and North Korea) the Canadian government is opposed to[xvi]. Actually, Canada is the first of the five eye countries to do this.

 

While Canada is denouncing China and reducing its expatriates, the US is increasing its contact with Beijing and signing many record-breaking contracts. The Secretary of State made clear that while China and the US will compete vigorously, the United States will responsibly manage that competition so that the relationship does not veer into conflict. Noting the importance of ties between the people of the United States and the PRC, both sides welcomed strengthening people-to-people exchanges between students, scholars, and business. This includes a commitment to working to increase the number of direct flights between the two countries. Both sides agreed on follow-on senior engagements in Washington and Beijing to continue open lines of communication. The Secretary made clear that the United States will work with its allies and partners to advance our vision for a world that is free, open, and upholds the rules-based international order[xvii]. As mentioned in another report, the United States “stands by the commitments made by President Biden, namely the United States does not seek a new Cold War, it does not seek to change China’s system, its alliances are not directed at China, it does not support ‘Taiwan’s independence’, and it does not seek conflict with China," China Central Television quoted Blinken as saying. According to the top US diplomat, Washington looks forward to high-level exchanges with Beijing and hopes to maintain free communication. The US also hopes that China will responsibly handle existing differences between the countries and seek dialogue and cooperation[xviii].

 

3. Whether It Is Practical

Labelled "global fragmentation," the issue was raised at a recent International Monetary Fund meeting in Washington, D.C. The current Canadian dispute may represent a further fracturing of the world into competing trade blocs that will not only make us all poorer, but impede crucial talks on shared global threats, including climate change and artificial intelligence. "Even as we need more international co-operation on multiple fronts, we are facing the spectre of a new Cold War that could see the world fragment into rival economic blocs," warned IMF boss Kristalina Georgieva earlier this year. "This would be a collective policy mistake that would leave everyone poorer and less secure." Despite a rhetoric of division and some calls for "decoupling," Goldfarb of Asia Pacific Foundation points out that Canada's stated Indo-Pacific strategy specifically includes engagement with China, even as it looks to expand relations with other Asian trade partners, including India. "You can't simply disengage from the second largest economy in the world," she said, pointing out that China is already beginning to develop policy in the important area of generative artificial intelligence that others, including Canadian AI leader Geoffrey Hinton, say demands global co-operation.[xix]

 

4. Whether It Is Sustainable

Canada’s relationship with China is long-standing and dates from well before the establishment of diplomatic relations in 1970. Canada is represented by an embassy in Beijing and consulates general in Chongqing, Guangzhou, Hong Kong and Shanghai. These diplomatic missions are supported by a secondary network of 10 trade offices, spread across the country, which are operated through an arrangement with the Canadian Commercial Corporation.

 

Strong people-to-people ties link Canada and China: over 1.8 million Canadian residents are of Chinese origin, and in 2020, more than 117,000 Chinese students with study permits for six months or more attended Canadian educational institutions. Chinese is Canada’s third most spoken language after English and French, and immigrants born in China (including the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region) form one of the largest groups within Canada’s immigrant population[xx].

 

Year over year, there was a trio of decliners in terms of consuming Canadian exports. These were Hong Kong (down -9.2% from 2021), France (down -6.5%) and mainland China (down -2.2%)[xxi]. However, China was the second largest trade partner with Canada in 2022. Therefore, any wise person may know in which direction Canada needs to go in terms of trade.

 

No it is a high time to reconsider Canada’s relationship with China. First, it is beneficial to utilize comparative advantage in international trade. Secondly, it is no more the Cold War era, and China is now a market economy. Thirdly, the roles of NATO need to be re-examined. On July 12, Member of Germany's Bundestag Sevim Dagdelen debunked 3 myths peddled by certain Western governments and their media outlets about NATO, arguing that “NATO is a defensive alliance" citing the war in Yugoslavia and the one in Afghanistan and the bombing of the Chinese embassy. She also undermined the myths that claim “NATO is an alliance of democracies promoting the rule of law" quoting that 1.5 million people died in the colonial was in Africa, and “NATO defends human rights" citing the Guantanamo prison and US imprisonment of Assange for 175 years. “What we need is peace, not NATO,” she emphasized, addressing the German Federal Parliament on the Vilnius Summit[xxii]. The author does not agree to the cancellation of NATO, but thinks their roles need to be reassessed.

 

IV. Conclusion

Sino-Canada relations are a complex and important issue, involving political, economic, cultural and other aspects. In recent years, with the rise of China and the relative stagnation of Canada, China-Canada relations have faced a number of challenges and opportunities. In this context, the Canadian government needs to take positive measures to strengthen economic and trade relations with China and reduce its dependence on the United States to both become more independent and obtain more room of discretion and flexibility, which may open another door to achieve its own development and prosperity.

 

Canada needs to strengthen cooperation with China in the economic and trade field for the mutual economic benefits of Canada and China as well as for maintaining a new international order. China is one of the largest markets in the world, with huge consumption power and potential. Canada needs to strengthen cooperation with China in trade, investment, science and technology to achieve mutual benefits and win-win results. At the same time, China has made significant progress in scientific and technological innovations, artificial intelligence, 5G and other fields, and Canada needs to strengthen cooperation with China in these fields to enhance its competitiveness and scale.

 

On the other hand, Canada needs to maintain political cooperation with the United States to safeguard its own interests and regional stability. At the same time, Canada also needs to cooperate with other countries on global issues such as counter-terrorism, non-proliferation and climate change to maintain global security and stability.

 

Furthermore, with the rise of China and the relative stagnation of Canada, Canada needs to adopt a more positive attitude and measures to strengthen its own development and reform.

 

At the same time, Canada also needs to enhance exchanges and cooperation with China in order to understand China's culture, history and social system and provide reference and inspiration for its own economic development and reform as well as international stability.

 

In short, China-Canada relations are a complex and important issue that requires joint efforts and cooperation from both sides. The present policy is not wise, fair, practicable nor sustainable. Canada needs to take positive measures to strengthen economic and trade ties with China and take measures to achieve greater autonomy and flexibility in economic activities. This may also help with its own development and reform to adapt to the needs of globalization and international competition. Otherwise, this policy may turn out to be a very “fine” one leading Canada to a dilemma and perplexion.

 

一个又好又公平的政策?

-            对加拿大中国政策的反思

-            (摘要)

 

加拿大与中国的关系源远流长,早在1970年两国建交之前有关的交往就开始了。超过180万加拿大居民是华裔,汉语是加拿大仅次于英语和法语的第三大语言。中国已成为加拿大第二大贸易伙伴。然而,由于相互驱逐外交官,制裁亚投行和拟议的外国干涉法案等多起事件,中加关系处于历史最低点。对中国干涉的担忧笼罩着渥太华。今年2月下旬,加拿大一些政客和媒体接连炒作中国驻加领事馆所谓干涉加选举和内政的事情。那名加拿大员工从亚投行辞职的行为很奇怪,也太过匆忙,让我们怀疑是否应该根据某些个别事件来改变外交政策。外国干涉法针对的是俄罗斯、中国、伊朗和朝鲜,为什么没有提到其他国家?尽管双边贸易持续增长,但值得注意的是,2022年第四季度,加拿大从中国的进口大幅下降。整个2022年,中国和加拿大的广泛关系都在降温。尽管加拿大方面的贸易呈下降趋势,但美国和欧洲方面与中国的贸易有增加的迹象。2022年中美货物贸易总额比上年增长约5%,达到6900亿美元左右,是加拿大和中国货物贸易总额的约7倍多。2022年,加中双边直接投资降至2003年以来最低水平:来自中国的投资仅占亚洲对加拿大直接投资总额的1%,加拿大对中国的投资仅占加拿大对该地区对外直接投资的0.4%,远低于2003年至2021年间130亿加元的年平均水平。在移民方面,2022年来自阿富汗和尼日利亚的移民数量急剧增加,未来可能会超过中国和印度。在加拿大谴责中国并减少其外派人员的同时,美国正在加强与北京方面的接触,并签署了许多破纪录的合同。根据拜登总统的说法,美国不寻求一场新的冷战,不寻求改变中国的制度,其对外联盟不针对中国,也不寻求与中国发生冲突。近年来,随着中国的崛起和加拿大的相对停滞,中加关系面临诸多挑战和机遇。加拿大需要加强与中国在经贸领域的合作,以实现加中两国的经济互利,并维护国际新秩序。与此同时,中国在科技创新、人工智能、5G等领域取得重大进展,加拿大需要加强与中国在这些领域的合作,提升竞争力和规模经济效益。加拿大也需要采取更加积极的态度,采取措施加强自身的发展和改革。总之,中加关系既重要又复杂,需要双方一起努力,携手合作。现行的政策不明智、不公平、不实际,也不可持续。遏制或无接触要么是愚蠢的,要么是恶毒的。

 

关键词:中国;威胁;公平;实用性;贸易和投资

 

 



[i] Don Pittis: Economists worry growing conflict with China will make Canada and the world poorer, CBC News, 12 May 2023. Please take time to read the whole article by clicking the link https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/global-fragmentation-column-don-pittis-1.6837222.

[ii] Karel Brandenbarg : Canada-China Trade: 2022 Year in Review, University of Alberta China

Institute, 19 April 2023. Please take time to read the whole article by clicking the link https://www.ualberta.ca/china-institute/research/analysis-briefs/2023/2022-yearinreview.html.

[iii] European and American politicians and companies have visited Beijing one after another, but Japanese maintained a low-key attitude, Banned Text Network, 1 July 2023, https://www.bannedbook.org/bnews/headline/20230701/1903093.html.

[iv] Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada: Canada-Asia Pacific Investment Trends, Investment Monitor, 26 May 2023, Page 5-6. Please refer to the comprehensive statistical article by clicking https://www.asiapacific.ca/publication/investment-monitor-2023-canada-asia-pacific-investment-in-2022.

[v] "Radicals, Extremists Will Come...": How UAE Foreign Minister 'Predicted' French Riots In 2017, Hindustan Times, accessed on 10 July 2023, https://youtu.be/-dV4m43xZmY.

[vi] Colin R. Singer: India And China Were The Top Sources Of New Permanent Residents To Canada In 2022. Please take time to read the whole article by clicking the link https://www.immigration.ca/india-and-china-were-the-top-sources-of-new-permanent-residents-to-canada-in-2022/.

[vii] China-Canada relations deteriorate again! China accuses Canada of smearing police overseasVancouver Harbour, 10 March 2023, https://www.bcbay.com/news/2023/03/10/847529.html.

[viii] MP's Family Threatened, accessed on 20 June 2023. Please take time to watch the video https://www.ctvnews.ca/mobile/video?clipId=2678807.

[ix] Xue Peiling: Canada's intelligence services have been accused of covering up MP's families likely being threatened by China, Oriental Daily, 4 May 2023. Please take time to read

https://www.orientaldaily.com.my/news/international/2023/05/04/563738.

[x] Andrew Mitrovica: The Damage Canada’s Spies Can Do, Aljazeera, 1 June 2023,

https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2023/6/1/the-damage-canadas-spies-can-do.

[xi] Ex-AIIB comms chief says was advised to flee China after fiery resignation,

Reuters, 16 June 2023. The reader can also click the following link to read the whole article: https://business.inquirer.net/405636/ex-aiib-comms-chief-says-was-advised-to-flee-china-after-fiery-resignation#ixzz84uWX7Jt.

[xiii] Public Safety Canada: Government of Canada launches public consultations on a Foreign Influence Transparency Registry in Canada, 10 March 2023. Please refer to the release at https://www.canada.ca/en/public-safety-canada/news/2023/03/government-of-canada-launches-public-consultations-on-a-foreign-influence-transparency-registry-in-canada.html.

[xiv] India among top actors for foreign interference in Canada: national security adviser, the Canadian Press, 5 June 2023. Please take time to refer to the complete article by clicking https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/india-among-top-actors-for-foreign-interference-in-canada-national-security-adviser-1.6428213#:~:text=More%20pressure%20to%20address%20foreign%20interference&text=Jody%20Thomas%20says%20"a%20number,%3A%20China%2C%20Russia%20and%20Iran.

[xv] Communications Security Establishment Canada: Canadian Centre for Cyber Security releases National Cyber Threat Assessment 2023-2024, 23 Oct 2023. Please read the following release https://www.canada.ca/en/communications-security/news/2022/10/canadian-centre-for-cyber-security-releases-national-cyber-threat-assessment-2023-20242.html.

[xvi] Daniel Xie: Canadians challenge calls for a foreign influence registry through Petition E-4395, 8 May 2023. Please go to the following website for your view of the electronic petition https://www.thecanadafiles.com/articles/canadians-challenge-calls-for-a-foreign-influence-registry-through-petition-e-4395.

[xvii] Readout: Secretary Blinken’s Visit to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), OFFICE OF THE SPOKESPERSON, JUNE 19, 2023, https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/adOf0SkbPJxHSyhTCetN8Q.

[xviii] US doesn't want conflict with China or new Cold War, says Blinken, Tass, 16 June 2023, https://tass.com/world/1634963.

[xix] Don Pittis: Economists worry growing conflict with China will make Canada and the world poorer, CBC News, 12 May 2023. Please take time to read the whole article by clicking the link https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/global-fragmentation-column-don-pittis-1.6837222.

[xx] Government of Canada: Canada-China relations, modified on 11 May 2023, https://www.international.gc.ca/country-pays/china-chine/relations.aspx?lang=eng.

[xxi] Daniel Workman: Canada’s Top Trading Partners, accessed 1 July 2023, https://www.worldstopexports.com/canadas-top-import-partners/.

[xxii] US-led NATO war alliance responsible for death of millions: German MP, Islamic Republic News Agency, 13 July 2023. Please take time to read the short yet interesting article https://en.irna.ir/news/85169006/US-led-NATO-war-alliance-responsible-for-death-of-millions-German. Combate, Tweet, 12 July 2023. Please click the link to watch the alerting video https://twitter.com/upholdreality/status/167920324401315430