Tuesday, October 25, 2016

Are We Ready for the Civic Election? 我们对本次市选举准备好了吗?


Abstract: Regina has seen in the last 4 years changes like a larger and a more diversified population, a slower growth rate and more infrastructure investment, as well a process of privatization and commercialization. The city’s vision is to become Canada's most vibrant, inclusive, attractive, sustainable community, where people live in harmony and thrive in opportunity. To embrace this vision, we need a government which is more amicable to the general public, more transparent and democratic in its decision-making, more just and fair in its process and procedures. The civic election can be as important as the provincial one, and counsellor candidates without party backgrounds may be a good thing for the city[i].

摘要:里贾纳在过去4年经历了人口的增长和多样化,增长速度减慢和基础设施投资的增加,以及私有化和商业化的过程。 该城市的远景规划是成为加拿大最具活力、最有包容性和吸引力和可持续发展的社区,人们生活和谐,城市在机会中繁荣兴旺。 为了拥抱这个远景,我们需要一个对公众更加友好、决策更加透明和民主、行政过程更为公正和公平的政府。 市政府的选举可以和省级选举一样重要,而没有政党背景的议员候选人可能是本城市的好事。

I.             Goals and Values

Regina’s vision[ii] is to become Canada's most vibrant, inclusive, attractive, sustainable community, where people live in harmony and thrive in opportunity. By being sustainable, people forge a balance between the economic, social, environmental and cultural dimensions of their decisions by serving as stewards of the resources we share and by demonstrating leadership. As to opportunity, the entrepreneurial spirit in research, innovation and excellence should be encouraged. The city’s mission is to aspire to be the best run municipality in Canada providing services that enhance our quality of life, and to serve our community, support the Vision of Council and live our Values. The values emphasize behavior in an appropriate and consistent manner, while committed to customer service and contemporary knowledge[iii].

II.          Changes and Concerns

Regina has seen a lot of changes in the last 4 years, some of which are:
l  A rapid increase in population. As of July 1, 2015, Regina's census metropolitan area (CMA) population was estimated at 241,422, which is an increase of 1.87 per cent or 4,427 people from 2014[iv]. Saskatchewan's two biggest cities continue to grow faster than other urban areas across Canada, according to Statistics Canada.
l  A more diversified population. According to the census of 2011, within the whole population of Regina, there are 9.5% Aboriginals and 10.6% of visible minorities[v], which have both increased significantly, especially the Aboriginal people.
l  More infrastructure investment including the new stadium, wastewater treatment plant and the bypass
l  Liquor store privatization and the tentative sale of SaskTel
l  Some service cutdown from the provincial government like no more funding for land to build schools, no more IB courses after Grade 10, etc.
l  Under the present circumstance, Regina has seen 2130 people newly on EI this August, 80 more than in July, and 380 than in last August, while in Saskatoon there is a reduction of 680 people in August than in July[vi].

Some of the comments posted[vii] include:

With the huge future financial responsibility to the taxpayers of Regina due to the present City of Regina Employees Defined Benefits Pension Plan, why has council not instituted a Defined Contribution Pension Plan for all new employees (e.g. anyone starting with the city after December 1st, 2016)? This would be in line with the plan the provincial government put into place in the late 1970's.

What changes, if any, would you implement to make some of the major decisions being made by City of Regina more transparent and more open to public consultation and debate? No referendum was allowed for the new stadium and just recently the land transfer to the U of R was done in a very underhanded way – finance committee voted to approve the land transfer (how many people follow the agenda for the finance committee) – should have been advertised to the citizens of Regina to allow them an opportunity to voice their concerns – once finance committee voted in favor the recommendation was made to council to approve – obviously the people in favor of the land transfer were made aware of its presence on the council agenda so they could make presentations and be in attendance – not all councilors were in attendance at the meeting and then 3 of them excused themselves from the vote because of conflict of interest leaving about 5 or 6 people to make such a major decision that will impact the future of Wascana Park – an unacceptable way to conduct business – if you are elected mayor how will you work to ensure these types of decisions will not be made behind closed doors in future and allow for MEANINGFUL public input?

More than half of the residents in Regina are renters, and they seldom go to stadiums to watch football games. Is it fair to pass the new stadium’s building cost to the home owners in Regina? Can we use municipal bonds, BOT or any other way to finance the project instead of taxing the owners?

III. Policy Alternatives to Tackle the Problems

We have seen a surge of property taxes and recycling fees. First, we advocate being sustainable, yet the policies we carry out may either drive new migrants out or make the old people leave; secondly, is it possible to issue municipal bonds or resort to BOT for financing big projects like the new stadium or the wastewater treatment plant.

As for the transfer of land to UofR, is there a more democratic way to make the changes other than having a committee to approve the change? Should we still lease the land instead of selling it?

As for the retirement plan, is it possible to administer a new retirement policy for new employees? Is it more feasible to use part-time employees or contractors for some projects while adhering to the quality standards?

For privatization, the rule of thumb should be to keep the public good public. For semi-public goods, we can use a combination of ways to manage the business so as to both protect the interest of the general public and to make the business more viable.

IV. What Kind of Mayor We Need

A mayor we need is one with far foresight, one with great leadership skills and one who can coordinate with his co-workers to achieve the best well-being of Regina’s citizens.

According to their declarations, the author has made the following chart to outline their platforms:


Jobs & Growth
Green Society
Multiculti-
Culturalism & Human Rights
Affordable Housing
Public Transit
Anti-
Violence
Anti-
Privati-
zation
Meet Regu-
larly with the Public
Michael Fougere
   x




   x


Tony Fiacco
   x


    x

   x


Jim Elliott

   x
    x
    x
   x


  x
Wayne Ast


    x
    x


   x

Evangeline Godron


    x






Here we can see some candidates have addressed more areas than others. While we may not know if they will walk their talk, we at least know who is advocating what. This is important especially when we don’t know much about the candidates. On the other hand, there is a saying that the wealthier the people, the stronger the government. Therefore, the most important is to conduct a policy to make Regina’s citizens rich, both materially and spiritually.

V. Conclusion

A government which is more amicable to the general public, more transparent and democratic in its decision-making, more just and fair in its process and procedures will be the best choice. While we need to balance growth and equity, we need to know public goods should not be taken for private goods, and affordable housing is not an option but a necessity for low-income people. A good society relies as well on the integrative positive contribution of social organizations and businesses, whether big or small. 




[i] Ashley Martin: Don't expect Regina's voter turnout to skyrocket, says U of R Prof, http://leaderpost.com/news/local-news/dont-expect-reginas-voter-turnout-to-skyrocket-says-u-of-r-prof, Leader Post, Oct24, 2016.
[ii] City Administration: Discover Regina’s Vision, http://www.regina.ca/residents/budget/, accessed on Oct 25, 2016.
[iv] City of Regina: Regina’s Population Continues to Grow, http://www.regina.ca/press/news-and-announcements/reginas-population-continues-to-increase/, February 19, 2016.
[v] Evan Radford: Minorities Are on the Ballot in Regina’s Municipal Election, http://www.prairiedogmag.com/2016-10-13/more-diversity/, Prairie Dog, Oct 13, 2016.
[vi] Statistics Canada: 2130 people in Regina went on EI this August in Regina, Chinese Network in Regina, Oct 22, 2016.
[vii] Aimee Sudom: Regina: Your Voice, Your Concerns, https://reginavotes.ca/2016/10/20/your-voice-your-concerns/#comments, Oct 25, 2016.

Monday, March 21, 2016

How can Saskatchewan get out of the tunnel? (萨省将如何走出低谷?)


2016年2月与1月相比,加拿大共减少2300个职位,失业率升至三年最高,达7.3%,与经济学家此前预测的新增9000个职位,失业率维持不变的说法相去甚远;萨省则减少7800个职位,失业率升至5.9%,是西部唯一减少职位的省份,也是过去一年来失业上升第二快的省份。从政策上来看,如何在经济、能源和移民政策上协调一致,如何与国家政策以及各省的政策互相配合,将值得我们深思。另外,医疗检查的私有化和经济适用房的取消也给反对党一个强有力的攻击理由。

For a steady period Saskatchewan is known as the economic engine of Canada. At such a time with falling prices of oil and gas and potash, the rising US dollar, the cost push inflation, and the United States beginning exporting oil, Saskatchewan can no longer board on the passenger ship of yesterday.


1.       What our focus should be

While the national housing price will go up by 8% this year, this province will experience a drop of 2.4%, though BC and ON will contribute much to it. However, Saskatchewan can be proud of its exports as mining and agricultural products have experienced a sharp increase in the past year with latter increasing by 33%, making Saskatchewan the second largest exporter in the country.

Saskatchewan's unemployment rate in December 2015 was 5.5%, the country’s lowest for 26 of the past 27 months, and Regina is still one of the easiest cities to find work, according to data shown in January 2016. As of January 2016, unemployment rate is found to be the lowest in Canada at 6.1%, and population growth the second highest of all the provinces from 2011 to 2015 at 6.3% (Statistics Canada).

Nerveless, in February 2016, while Canada experienced the unemployment rate of 7.3% (lowest in 3 years), a net increase of 0.1 percentage point monthly, Saskatchewan experienced the unemployment rate of 5.9%, a net increase of 0.3 percentage point, and the employment rate change has been the only negative in the western provinces (with BC and MB each gaining 0.3 and 0.2 percentage point). This means that Saskatchewan’s status as a province enjoying a high employment rate is getting challenged. Though Alberta is also hit by the oil and gas slump, its employment rate remains unchanged in February. Therefore our focus should be how to increase employment so as to create a beneficial business cycle through incentives to small and medium businesses. Saskatchewan’s investment in such infrastructure projects as highways, city ring roads, sewage treatment plants and schools and stadiums have not only increased employment, but also laid a good foundation for the growth of private enterprises. However, the government should monitor its deficit carefully so that the future generation will not be paying for the debt of this generation.

 
 

Labor force characteristics by province (monthly)
(Canada, SK, AB, BC and MB)
 
January 2016
February 2016
January 2016 to February 2016
February 2015 to February 2016
January 2016 to February 2016
February 2015 to February 2016
 
thousands
%
Canada
 
 
 
 
 
 
Population
29,439.8
29,465.4
25.6
304.7
0.1
1.0
Labour force
19,395.5
19,413.3
17.8
212.6
0.1
1.1
Employment
18,005.2
18,002.9
-2.3
117.9
0.0
0.7
Unemployment
1,390.3
1,410.4
20.1
94.7
1.4
7.2
Participation rate (%)
65.9
65.9
0.0
0.1
Unemployment rate (%)
7.2
7.3
0.1
0.4
Employment rate (%)
61.2
61.1
-0.1
-0.2
Sask.
Population
865.2
865.8
0.6
7.4
0.1
0.9
Labour force
607.0
601.1
-5.9
4.1
-1.0
0.7
Employment
573.3
565.5
-7.8
-1.1
-1.4
-0.2
Unemployment
33.7
35.6
1.9
5.2
5.6
17.1
Participation rate (%)
70.2
69.4
-0.8
-0.1
Unemployment rate (%)
5.6
5.9
0.3
0.8
Employment rate (%)
66.3
65.3
-1.0
-0.7
Alta.
Population
3,381.7
3,385.6
3.9
57.8
0.1
1.7
Labour force
2,457.8
2,471.9
14.1
41.5
0.6
1.7
Employment
2,276.1
2,277.5
1.4
-21.2
0.1
-0.9
Unemployment
181.7
194.3
12.6
62.6
6.9
47.5
Participation rate (%)
72.7
73.0
0.3
0.0
Unemployment rate (%)
7.4
7.9
0.5
2.5
Employment rate (%)
67.3
67.3
0.0
-1.8
B.C.
Population
3,905.9
3,910.0
4.1
54.5
0.1
1.4
Labour force
2,503.0
2,518.0
15.0
88.5
0.6
3.6
Employment
2,336.9
2,351.0
14.1
68.8
0.6
3.0
Unemployment
166.0
167.0
1.0
19.7
0.6
13.4
Participation rate (%)
64.1
64.4
0.3
1.4
Unemployment rate (%)
6.6
6.6
0.0
0.5
Employment rate (%)
59.8
60.1
0.3
0.9
Man.
Population
992.8
994.0
1.2
10.9
0.1
1.1
Labour force
669.5
671.2
1.7
-0.8
0.3
-0.1
Employment
628.7
630.7
2.0
-4.3
0.3
-0.7
Unemployment
40.8
40.5
-0.3
3.5
-0.7
9.5
Participation rate (%)
67.4
67.5
0.1
-0.9
Unemployment rate (%)
6.1
6.0
-0.1
0.5
Employment rate (%)
63.3
63.5
0.2
-1.1
Note:Population 15 and over.
Sources: Statistics Canada, CANSIM, table 282-0087 and Catalogue no. 71-001-XIE.
Last modified: 2016-03-11.

Date modified: 2016-03-11


2.       Coordination of policies

Wall advocated federal spending from the stimulus package of $ 156 million for subsidies to the oil industry. It was pointed out that if the government long ago put a surcharge on new wells or support the training of laid-off workers, build roads and hospitals using the money proposed for the clean-up, taxpayers may come up better off. While the oil companies may still take up their own responsibility, the federal and provincial governments should seek a positive role to support the economy.

Ottawa intends to introduce a "carbon tax" this year, with the price of $15 per ton. Saskatchewan's per capita carbon emissions are 68 tons, while Canada’s emissions per capita are 19 tons, far less than the former. It is estimated that a federal "carbon tax" will result in a drop in agricultural and mining revenues as well as an increase in the price of oil, gas, electricity, and food. The practice of British Columbia is a provincial "carbon tax" partially to cut consumption taxes and income taxes, and partially to invest in cleaner energy technologies and equipment. This is because that the carbon tax is revenue neutral, meaning every dollar generated by the tax is returned to residents in BC through reductions in other taxes, and the Minister of Finance is required by law to annually prepare a three-year plan for recycling carbon tax revenues through tax reductions. The writer believe that the practice of BC and the US approach can be combined, with introduction of carbon emission upper limits or cap, exceeding which companies need to be purchase from the others who have a surplus quota, so as to both enhance the flexibility of carbon emissions, and to encourage cleaner energies, and to put more money in the tax payers’ hands. Since the early 1980s, this cap-and-trade system has reduced acid rain-forming emissions in the US by nearly half.

 
Meanwhile, the government's immigration policy cannot be a stop-gap measure, which does not solve the problems ultimately. It should be part of a whole structure together with the government's economic policy and energy policy. Coordination of the refugees, temporary workers, skilled workers and enterprise immigrants on the national scale and between the categories is more and more in demand. The writer suggests a raise in the proportion of the economic class immigrants (especially enterprise immigrants and skilled workers) with the aid of the federal government, and an encouragement of private sponsorship of refugees.

3.       Social Programs

In January 2015, the provincial government announced a plan to overhaul affordable housing programs. The tenants there will have to either seek social housing or pay a much higher rent, which would impact the working poor most. While the opposition party argues that privatization of MRI has given access to rich people to hospital treatment, the ruling party says there is a condition to provide another service to the community. The writer suggests issuing an examination card to low income people so that they can have the same access at the same time, and the standard and the price of the service should still be kept by the government.

Conclusion: In the economic globalization today, Saskatchewan cannot be spared, so designing far-sighted strategies and getting prepared for rain in times of shine is the only correct choice. If we can implement multi-faceted foreign trade strategy, strengthen the strategic resource planning and reserves, support the working people, search and utilize new talents through a proper immigration policy and multiculturalism (by cultivating the information and culture industry), upgrade the transportation and the circulation system, flexibly use the Pacific Rim and the North American free trade framework, cutback on red tape and increase in efficiency of government services and accountability, Saskatchewan will not only step out of the tunnel, re-see the dawn, but also experience a new take-off as a phoenix reborn.