Abstract: Foreign
Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland is condemning violence in Hong Kong as
tension escalates between pro-democracy protesters and police and support Hong
Kong’s “high degree of autonomy” within China, as well as its residents’ right
to peaceful assembly. The protest was directly caused by introduction of an
extradition bill to transfer and try alleged criminals among mainland China,
Taiwan and Hong Kong and demand for more democracy. Economically,
each protest occurred when the government of Hong Kong
was about to implement land reform and increase more land supplies as the
interests of a wealthy group of people were encroached upon. During the 156
years of colonial rule in Hong Kong, there is no elected government, no right
to minimum wages, no freedom of speech or the press. According to the
right-winged Heritage Foundation, Hong Kong is now the freest society in the
world. Yet the young people would like to have more democracy, and the US
Congress is proposing the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act to intervene
in the already muddy situation. Hong Kong would be almost dead with no support from
mainland China. As the extradition bill may jeopardy
Hong Kong’s autonomy, the bill should be dropped permanently. The riot cannot
be misused to complicate relationships. Hong Kong has already missed a golden
opportunity to upgrade its industries, and it should not lose other
opportunities in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. The people of
Hong Kong should be clearly aware of this.
Key
Words: Democracy, Hong Kong, universal suffrage, foreign
support
(Pictured in Victoria Park, Causeway Bay, Hong Kong by
AFP Aug 18, 2019)
The economic scale of East Asia, with China, Japan,
South Korea, Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Macao and Singapore included, has
already surpassed $24 trillion (in terms of GDP), far more than that of NAFTA
($21 trillion) and the European Union ($19 trillion). If there is an economic
and political centre, this should be Hong Kong, due to its excellent legal
system, a balance of the Western and Oriental cultures, the 3rd
largest global stock market and the springboard for Renminbi Yuan
internationalization[i].
However, a protest lasting for more than 2 months is
putting this centre at great risk. Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland
is condemning violence in Hong Kong as tension escalates between pro-democracy
protesters and police. She made the remarks in a joint statement issued on
August 16, 2019 with her counterpart in the European Union, Federica Mogherini.
The statement says that both Canada and the EU support Hong Kong’s “high degree
of autonomy” within China, as well as its residents’ right to peaceful
assembly. But they are urging restraint in the wake of “a rising number of
unacceptable violent incidents.”[ii]
Around 10 people met Saturday afternoon in front of Regina City Hall. They held
signs, chanted and went over five key demands made by those protesting against
the Hong Kong government: the withdrawal of a proposed extradition bill; the
release of arrested protesters and dropping of any related charges; “universal
suffrage.” Hong Kong’s chief executive, for example, is elected by a committee
rather than by its citizens; independent investigation of violent police
action; and a retraction of the use of the word “riot” to describe the protests[iii].
However, the tune got softened later on CBC. A Burnaby group voiced their
support for China in opposition to a series of pro-Hong Kong protests in
Vancouver saying some people may have misunderstood the cause of pro-China
demonstrators. It’s said the group is not against the Hong Kong territory or
democracy, and says the pro-China labels versus pro-Hong Kong labels create
more confusion. The group leader wants to see a peaceful end to
the chaotic demonstrations. The proposed extradition bill would have allowed
Hong Kong to send its residents to mainland China to face
criminal charges. Critics say defendants extradited to the mainland
might not have access to a fair trial in China, and fear Beijing
could also use the law to crack down on dissidents. However, the bill is
suspended. Protestors have called for a full withdrawal of the bill.
They've also added to their demands, calling for an amnesty for
demonstrators who have been arrested and demanding wider democratic reforms.
Nevertheless, according to Victor Feng, leader of the pro-China rally, as a
sovereign country, China has the right to a design its own legal system. It's also not fair to say the
country doesn't follow the rule of law just because it has a different set of
rules[iv].
Based
on a source in the Toronto-area Chinese-Canadian community, on August 17, 2019,
members of a seniors group were each paid $100 to attend a pro-China rally in
Toronto, something the Post could not confirm independently. Michael Chan, a
keynote speaker, was quoted as saying “we support Hong Kong’s police strictly
handing unrest”[v].
This may not be necessarily true, as the rally might be used as a tool for the coming
Federal election because the same reporter
is asserting that old Liberal Party membership forms were distributed at the
rally[vi].
Actually, news leaked out that Hong Kong students were paid to join in the
protest and were bullied to speak the same voice[vii].
Well, the writer here is not to side with either the protest party or the
anti-protest party, but to analyze the situation and voice comments as a third
party.
I.
Problems
1. Prolonging
Unrest
The demonstration has lasted for more than 70 days, and
participants have grown to 1.7 million. The unrest has become so serious that
passengers and reporters also got severely assaulted[viii].
As mentioned by the leader of the Hong Kong and Macao Office, what Hong Kong is
facing is the most serious in all the times.
2. Effects
on Economy and Confidence
As the demonstrators have gathered
around airports, train stations and subways, and more and more travelers are harassed
and blocked, journalist and policemen are assaulted, the traffic can be
paralyzed with inbound flights cancelled, and the whole economy may be damaged
to a degree that part of the losses can never be recovered. Also, many of the
technology talents and capital may flood out, and Hong Kong will not be an
Oriental pearl but a dead harbor, which some of the big countries may want to
see, as they may be able to take advantage from the confusion (though possibly
not in the long run).
II.
Reasons
1. Phenomenal
Reasons
1) Extradition
Bill
This is a proposed bill regarding
extradition to amend the Fugitive Offenders Ordinance (Cap. 503) in relation to
special surrender arrangements and the Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal
Matters Ordinance (Cap. 525) so that arrangements for mutual legal assistance
can be made between Hong Kong and any place outside Hong Kong. The bill was
proposed by the Hong Kong government in February 2019. The government proposed
to establish a mechanism for transfers of fugitives not only for Taiwan, but
also for Mainland China and Macau, which are not covered in the existing laws[ix].
The introduction of the bill is due to a
murdering case which happened in Taiwan 17 March 2018. A man from Hong Kong called
Chan Tong-kai, murdered his girlfriend Poon Hiu-wing, while they were on a
vacation to Taiwan, has so only been charged with theft and handling stolen
goods as the case happened in Taiwan and there is no extradition agreement
between Hong Kong and Taiwan. He has not been charged with the murder, since
there has been no opportunity for Taiwanese investigators to question him. Chan
will never face trial for the murder because of legal “loopholes” existing
between the judicial systems in Taiwan and Hong Kong. However, the introduction
of the bill which can prevent Hong Kong become a shelter for criminals caused
widespread criticism domestically and abroad from the legal profession,
journalist organizations, business groups, and foreign governments fearing the
erosion of Hong Kong's legal system and its built-in safeguards, as well as
damaging Hong Kong's business climate.
2) Double
Universal Suffrage
According to some scholars, the current
electoral system for chief executive and legislators is neither representative
nor fully democratic. The consequences of this can no longer be dismissed as
people fill the streets, clamoring to be heard. The long-term solutions to the
ongoing disruptive protests are either a more representative political system
or tighter control by the pro-Beijing government. The latter is undesirable to
most Hong Kong people. In a diverse society like Hong Kong, factions and
different opinions are inevitable. The reconciliation of the interests of
various social sectors is a major responsibility of the Hong Kong government,
and universal suffrage is the only long-term solution that does not sacrifice
Hong Kong’s autonomy and freedom. It directs people on the streets to express
their views through elections and forces them to compromise with others.
Furthermore, universal suffrage could also benefit China’s international image
in the long term, especially given its ambitious reunification plan for Taiwan.
Beijing once offered a form of direct
elections that would have allowed the public to elect Hong Kong’s chief
executive from a slate of two or three preapproved candidates. But pro-democracy legislators
voted down the measure in 2015, and Beijing’s supporters in the legislature
said then that the Communist Party was unlikely to offer more generous terms.
Lau Siu-kai, vice chairman of the Chinese Association of Hong Kong and Macau
Studies, a semiofficial research institute with ties to Beijing, told a Hong
Kong broadcaster that any debate on political reform would only “further divide
society.” President Xi has already made an extraordinary concession to the
protesters by allowing Mrs. Lam to suspend the bill, said Ma Ngok, an associate
professor of government at the Chinese University of Hong Kong. So the chances
that Mr. Xi would agree to political reforms, Mr. Ma said, are slim. “Given
that the entire country is still well on the road to full autocratic rule,” Mr.
Ma said, “it’s unlikely they would initiate any kind of liberalization in Hong
Kong.”[x]
The point is that the Hong Kong election
system is copied from the US. If this system is to blame, so should be the US
system. American democracy is controlled by a tiny minority of moneyed funders,
Lessig believes, much as New York politics were controlled by political bosses
during the 19th century[xi].
2. Internal
Reasons
The real problems with Hong Kong are far
more complicated than what it seems to be. Though Hong Kong was taken as a
colony under Britain, many people have an attachment to Britain as if Britain
was their foster parents.
1) Economic
(1) The
Abnormal Housing Market
Hong Kong does not have many sustainable growth
industries, with the economy very much reliant on real estate and finance and
banking. However, the housing market is stratospheric, and housing prices have
increased dramatically, bringing forward also the rapid increase of rent. With
the Joint Declaration, the British people could take advantage of all the
existing framework and contracts and make a huge profit so that they could take
home 500 billion pounds. Housing prices went up by 300% from 2003 to 2014[xii],
and many local young people have lost hope to have a property of their own.
Actually there
were three large-scale protests in the history of Hong Kong, each of which
occurred when the government of Hong Kong was about to implement land reform
and increase more land supplies. Chief Executive Tung Chee-hwa was forced to
resign in his second term in office asserting he was ill. While housing prices
increased by more than 3 times from 2002 to 2017, the median family income
increased by 0.71 times, and the housing price to income ratio was nearly 48
times. Later on Leung Chun-ying was criticized for filling the sea and
reclaiming some land, and he also had to quit due to the Occupy Central Hong
Kong Movement asserting he had some family issues. Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor
set the affordable housing price to half the market price, and the real estate
and financial gurus put on the same performance[xiii].
There is a saying that those who trade sell you opium and those who play
finance with you deliver you chaos.
(2) The Dutch Disease
Hong used to be
a key port for intermediary trade in the world, and has had a history in its
capital and technology intensive industries. However, it role was modified due
to the US trade blockage in the 1950’s and then the take-off of mainland China
in 2001 (symbolized by its joining WTO). Its lack of core industries, lassez-faire
policy and passive attitude to trade with China has restrained its further
development, and it has gradually given way to Shanghai, Shenzhen, Nongbo and
Singapore.
(3) The
Pegged Exchange Rate
The pegged exchange rate is written in
the Joint Declaration between Britain and mainland China, and the Chinese
government has a commitment to it. This system usually relies on foreign
exchange reserves and confidence in the currency. Professor Mundell has
mentioned that the three of an independent monetary policy, free capital flows
and a fixed exchange rate cannot exist at the same time. Though some have critiqued
on credibility of his theory, his theory is widely accepted.
2) Social
It is said that the wealth
disparity in Hong Kong is the highest among all developed countries and
regions. Some people have to be crowded in a space of 50 to 60 square feet, and
many feel hopeless, especially among the young people, with the British taking
away land profits of 500 billion pounds, and some of the professional people
emigrating to Britain and Canada for fear of loss of freedom after 1997.
3) Political
Hong Kong was returned to China as
the 99-year lease of New Territory of Hong Kong from Britain was over, and the
US strongly supported China to take Hong Kong back at that time. However,
everything remains the same except for a Chinese flag at Victoria Harbor. The
legislative and judicial powers were left to the pro-British elite, with no
representatives from labor and the general public. Therefore, the judicial power
is not in the hands of China, and foreign forces cannot be restrained. Though the violent protest becomes
illegal, China can hardly do anything with it. Many of those protestors are
university students and white-collar workers influenced and possibly
manipulated by foreign forces. Also, Hong Kong is not like Singapore in that
the government does not possess land. In Singapore, all the land belongs to the
government, and the government has both authority and economic power. Universal
suffrage was addressed earlier, and it is believed that it will be more
beneficial to the British who already have a stake in Hong Kong. It is said by
some scholars that the losses incurred after the Soviet Union was disintegrated
were even higher than those incurred in World War II, there were many economic
losses in Russia in addition to the drop in population (by half), decrease in
land (5 million square kilometers) and the drop in life expectancy[xiv].
4) International
Before the British
returned Hong Kong's sovereignty to China in 1997, 50,000 Hong Kong people,
mainly white-collar professionals and civil servants, were awarded British
passports. To appease the people, other Hong Kong people can apply for the
status of a British national (overseas). A person with this status does not
require a visa to enter the UK, but does not have a right of abode. About 400,000 people in
Hong Kong currently hold British National (Overseas) passports, some of whom
require the UK to allow them to stay. Members of the Campaign for the Right of
Homeland said that Hong Kong people have been ruled by the British for 156
years and are still discriminated against, giving them a feeling of betrayal[xv].
Many Hong Kong people hold multiple citizenships
(especially Canadian passports, HKSAR passports, British National (Overseas)
passports). Since 1997, some Hong Kong Canadians have returned to Hong Kong and
continue to live in Hong Kong. In 2014, Hong Kong was the city with the most
Canadian citizens in Asia. A total of about 300,000 people from different
ethnic backgrounds are Canadian nationals[xvi].
The support behind the protest is interesting. Protestors
routinely carry US flags and photos of Donald Trump, and the protest at the
airport is said to be “deeply tactical” – masked using umbrellas, banners,
signs, gasoline bombs, flaming bricks, arson and steel bars. CIA-backed NED
funds bankroll the demonstrators in millions to promote a hostile and
suspicious attitude toward China and communism (note the author believes that
China is carrying out national capitalism, not communism)[xvii]. The reason for
doing this may be to create chaos so that the American financial gurus can take
advantage and to suppress China so that it won’t be a threat to it. That is why
half of the 800 US overseas military bases surround China, and that is why the
support of the protest is done hand-in-hand with international efforts to ban
Huawei 5G technology, cancellation of a joint study of cancer and the arrest of
Chinese corporate officers. Actually the author would applaud for Huawei 5G in
Canada because it is good to have someone who can compete with Apple, because
no back doors are found in Huawei cell phones by British intelligence personnel
(if found, Trump would gush over it every day), and because when using Huawei your consent is asked for regarding
privacy while when using Iphones no consent is needed as they can dig into your
device anyhow and even find you if you have turned off your cell phone.
(Protests in Hong Kong routinely
carry the US flag and photos of Donald Trump, see Note xvii)
The case with Britain is another story. During the 156
years of colonial rule in Hong Kong, there is no elected government (note that
the governor is appointed and he is not restrained by anyone in Hong Kong but
the Queen of England), no right to minimum wages, no freedom of speech or the
press (not even on the books in colonial Hong Kong)[xviii]. Before the
British retreat, the ruling class have tampered with Hong Kong through the following: gave
away British passports to some of the elite (about 50,000 high-ranking
officials and wealthy businessmen, who can become British citizens just by
using a password) and BN(O) to a larger group of people; established HKCTU to
counter and undercut the Hong Kong Federation of Trade Unions founded in 1948,
which is still the largest trade union organization with 410,000 members; started
the political reform and set up a partially elected government; set up the
Special Branch under British intelligence to train Hong Kong officials; changed
the Hong Kong Societies Ordinance and Hong Kong Public Relations Order
Ordinance to make it easier for protest and gathering after the handover[xix]. The controversy in Britain’s late democracy may be due to
easiness in governance and mainland China’s reluctance in fear of its
independence.
According to the right-winged Heritage Foundation, Hong
Kong is now the freest society in the world, with its openness to global
commerce and vibrant entrepreneurial climate, low taxes, light regulations and
the strongest property rights. Yet the young people would like to have more
democracy, and the US Congress is proposing the Hong Kong Human Rights and
Democracy Act.
III.
Possible Outcome
1.
Gradual
Decolonization
Hong Kong has
been a British colony for 156 years, and the rule of Hong Kong was for the
benefit of Britain. The process to become decolonized takes another 100 years
in which there may be three steps: national liberation, economic reform and
political modernization.
2.
A Strong Leader
Like Sir Murray MacLehose
Sir Crawford Murray
MacLehose was once Governor for Hong Kong from 1971 to 1982. He
was the longest-serving governor of the colony, with four successive terms in
office. He handled
successfully the 1967 anti-government Leftist Riot in which 51 people died and
802 people got wounded by dispersing the mob and arresting 1936 people[xx].
He started the independence investigation, set up the Independent Commission
against Corruption, initiated the 10-year Housing Construction Plan, promoted
the Resident Affordable Housing Program and started the 9-year free education
for children. He contributed the take-off of Hong Kong as one of the Four
Little Dragons by developing industries like electronics, finance and banking
and commerce. He was also the Hong Kong governor to visit Beijing after 1949,
and was regarded at the time the best governor of Hong Kong[xxi].
However, Beijing would not like to see a British man back, and Hong Kong is now
more divided.
3.
Other Outcome
It is said that
Hong Kong is like a long-lost child, but he got sarcomata on his body when he
came back to the family. However, the child does know how much his parents care
for him, and he still missed the time he was with the drug dealer. The glorious
past can no longer be prided on, and Hong Kong is now at it critical moment. A
universal suffrage won’t solve the problem, as shown in many other countries
and regions. Since Hong Kong is now part of China, the more it is integrated to
mainland China, the better it will be. Even for Western countries like Canada,
which would you prefer, a river with live flowing water, or a deep pool of dead
water?
People may ask
what the future of Hong Kong is, and some argue Hong Kong may not want to be an
industrial power-house again. To have a better life, Hong Kong and mainland
China need to use wit to discard all the differences and find ways to
cooperate, not only with each other but also with other countries and regions.
Technology and finance could be some of the focal areas to develop, yet Hong
Kong needs to have a good climate for capital and expertise to stay. The “one-country,
two systems” is a great concept, and it takes courage and wit to implement it,
both to keep Hong Kong as a tax-free democratic trade and financial centre and to
promote the growth of China and other parts of Asia.
IV.
Principles
to Be Borne in Mind
Every
experienced adult knows well how to manage a family, and every experienced
businessman knows how to manage a company. Well, what would you do when some
employees boycott to the company’s policy? What would the municipal government
do when some citizens hold violent demonstrations in a city? Just recently
Atlanta police arrested about 200 people, and in the 1967 Hong Kong Leftist
Riot, thousands of people got arrested.
No democracy or
freedom makes sense where there is no order, and the rule of law should be the
most important. A region gets established only if a country gets established.
Hong Kong would lose its dynamics with no support from mainland China. When
interests are competing the majority should be taken care of. However, the
majority of Hong Kong people are those that still struggle with sufficient
housing and a decent living style. Those protestors cannot represent the
majority. Also, in management leadership and team work are stressed. In local
governance, wise governance and coordination should be emphasized.
V.
Comparison
of Measures
1. Use
of Military Force
This option is ruled out as Hong Kong is
labeled as a “one country, two system” region with a high level of autonomy,
and Beijing will be condemned and segregated as it had been in the June 4
Event.
2. Peaceful
Negotiation
This was what was done by the present
French government, and the result was not effective. Information time makes it
hard for fraud, but hard as well for screening and clarification of
information. Unless everyone has a heart to appreciate, to listen and to show
compassion and sympathy, the world will be far from perfect.
3. Other
Measures
Though universal suffrage is a good
idea, it can be done in steps. Though people have the freedom of speech and
gathering, it does not mean that passengers and reporters can be hurt, and
properties can be damaged. People committing violence and arson should be
arrested and charged, the organizers and sponsors of those illegal gatherings
should also be imprisoned. Those burning the national flags and damaging the
national anthems should be also charged, as there should be zero tolerance to
violence and damage to the state image. As the extradition bill may jeopardy
Hong Kong’s autonomy, the bill should be dropped permanently. However, when
there are some suspects which need to be delivered, they may go through a
hearing of a third party which comprises of some mainland Chinese, some Hong
Kong people and mostly of people from third countries or regions like Japan,
South Korea, Singapore and Taiwan with a irregularly rotating panel. In this
way, criminals can still be charged and punished, and meanwhile democracy is
not encroached.
VI.
Conclusion
The
situation of Hong Kong is complicated and hard to deal with. It is observed in
inland China that the students fight for nothing as what public facilities they
damage will only have effects on themselves, and the deeper the riot goes, the
more instability will be caused. Yet Hong Kong is already part of China. No
matter what happens there, this is a domestic and internal issue. The riot
cannot be misused to complicate the relationships between Hong Kong and
mainland China, between the central government and the Hong Kong government,
and between Hong Kong and foreign countries. Hong Kong has already missed a
golden opportunity to upgrade its industries, and it should not lose other
opportunities in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. The people of
Hong Kong should be clearly aware of this.
动乱的香港怎么啦？
摘要：因为民主抗议者和警察之间的紧张局势升级，外交部长克里斯蒂亚·弗里兰谴责香港的暴力事件，支持香港在中国的“高度自治”，以及居民的和平集会权利。抗议活动由可在中国大陆、台湾和香港之间转移和审讯疑犯的引渡法案以及要求更多的民主直接引起。在经济上，每次抗议都发生在因一小撮富有人群利益被侵占香港政府即将实施土地改革和增加土地供应的时候。在香港殖民统治156年期间，没有民选政府，没有最低工资，没有言论自由或新闻自由。根据右翼的传统基金会的说法，香港现在是世界上最自由的社会。然而，年轻人希望拥有更多的民主，而美国国会将通过“香港人权与民主法案”来介入已经混乱的局面。没有中国大陆的支持，香港就会变成一潭死水。由于引渡法案可能会危及香港的自治，因此该法案应永久撤销。但是，骚乱不能被滥用来使关系复杂化。香港已经错过了提升产业升级的黄金机会，不应该再失去粤港澳大湾区的其他机会。香港人应该清楚地知道这一点。
关键词：民主，香港，普选，海外资助
关键词：民主，香港，普选，海外资助
[i] Qiyuan Lu: the Hong Kong Nirvana (in Chinese), the Hundred Mile
Lotus Pond, August 16, 2019.
[ii] Chrystia Freeland condemns violence in Hong Kong, backs right to
peaceful assembly, BC Local News, August 18, 2019, please view the whole
article by clicking the following link: https://www.bclocalnews.com/news/chrystia-freeland-condemns-violence-in-hong-kong-backs-right-to-peaceful-assembly/.
[iii] Connor O’Donovan: Group voices solidarity with Hong Kong protesters
at Regina City Hall, Global News, August 17, 2019, please view the whole
article by clicking the following link: https://globalnews.ca/news/5779690/hong-kong-solidarity-protest-regina/.
[iv] Lien Yeung: Pro-China demonstrator wants Vancouverites to see other
side of Hong Kong protests, CBC News, August 22, 2019, please view the whole
article by clicking the following link: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/pro-china-demonstrator-wants-vancouverites-to-see-other-side-of-hong-kong-protests-1.5255527.
[v] Tom Blackwell: Ex-MPP Leads Rally for Beijing, Calgary Herald,
August 21, 2019,
[vi] Tom Blackwell: Liberal party membership forms distributed at
pro-Beijing rally against Hong Kong protests, National Post, August 22, 2019,
please view the whole article by clicking the link: https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/politics/liberal-party-membership-forms-distributed-at-pro-beijing-rally-against-hong-kong-protests/ar-AAGbWVh?li=AA521o.
[vii] Hong Kong Media: Protest Female Student Cried Regretting Joining in
After Receiving the Money (in Chinese), August 14, 2019, https://news.ifeng.com/c/7p8INdG2Lmy.
[viii] Strongly
Condemn Violence and Wish for Hong Kong back to Normal (in Chinese), Hong Kong
Economic Journal, August 21, 2019.
[ix] Timothy Tso: Legal Service Division Report on Fugitive Offenders
and Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Legislation (Amendment) Bill
2019, Legislative Council of Hong Kong;
Fears over Hong Kong-China Extradition
Plans, BBC, April 8, 2019, also view it online by clicking: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Hong_Kong_extradition_bill.
[x] Amy Qin: Hong Kong Protesters Are Fueled by a Broader Demand: More
Democracy, New York Times, July 8, 2019, please view the whole article by
clicking the link: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/08/world/asia/hong-kong-protests-democracy.html.
[xi] Sarah Bagley: Larry Lessig Compares America's Democracy to Hong
Kong's, Time, Sept 27, 2014, https://time.com/3436637/larry-lessig-democracy/;
Larry Lessig: Our Democracy No Longer Represents the People, and Here's How We
Fix It, Oct 20, 2015, please also view the video by clicking https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJy8vTu66tE.
[xii] IMF Research Dept: World Economic Outlook, October 2014: Legacies,
Clouds, Uncertainties ..., Page 37.
[xiii] Hongbin Song: the Final War in Hong Kong (in Chinese), 11 August
2019, please also read the article by clicking: https://bbs.wenxuecity.com/currentevent/18223/.
[xiv] Mingsu: Where is Russia Heading for, Getting Stronger or Falling
apart? (In Chinese) 14 October 2018, https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/46725352.
[xv] Some Hong
Kong people ask Britain for residency (in Chinese), Jan 21, 2015, please read
the article by clicking: https://www.voachinese.com/a/hongkong-uk-20150121/2607364.html.
[xvi] Nicholas Keung: Hong Kong: Asia's most Canadian city, the Toronto
Star, February 24, 2011.
[xvii] Sara Flounders: Follow the money behind Hong Kong protests, Workers
World, 16 Aug 2019,
[xviii] Sara Flounders: Follow the money behind Hong Kong protests, Workers
World, 16 Aug 2019,
[xix] Little Dragon Fish: How Many Mines Did the British Bury in 1997?
(in Chinese) 26 June 2019, DW News, http://blog.dwnews.com/post-1139645.html.
[xx] The 1967
Hong Kong Leftist Riot (in Chinese), accessed on 21 Aug 2019, also read the
article by clicking https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E5%85%AD%E4%B8%83%E6%9A%B4%E5%8A%A8.
[xxi] Sir
Crawford Murray MacLehose (in Chinese), accessed on 24 Aug 2019, please also
read the introduction by clicking: https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E9%BA%A6%E7%90%86%E6%B5%A9.
No comments:
Post a Comment